Green v. Rubenstein et al
Plaintiff: Jack Green
Defendant: James Rubenstein, Thomas McBride, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Mary Westfall and Devere, D.D.S
Case Number: 5:2007cv00363
Filed: January 7, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Beckley Office
County: Kanawha
Presiding Judge: Thomas E. Johnston
Presiding Judge: R. Clarke VanDervort
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 97 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the 93 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge and DIRECTS that the 80 Motion for Summary Judgment of Correctional Medical Services, Inc. and Mary Westfall b e GRANTED and that Plaintiff's 91 Motion to Dismiss Correctional Medical Service Inc. and Mary Westfall's Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED; the Court further DIRECTS that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 8/16/2010. (cc: USMJ VanDervort; attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)
August 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER: as moot denying Plaintiff's 52 MOTION to Dismiss; denying Defendant's 57 MOTION for Sanctions; granting Defendants' 69 MOTION for Modification of Time-Frame Order;" directing parties to file any dispositive motions by 9/14/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 8/19/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
March 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 75 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: adopting the 70 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; granting 22 Motion to Dismiss filed by Mary Westfall, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., and Dr. Devere, D.D.S; denying 46 Motion to Dismiss Deliberate Indif ference Claims filed by Correctional Medical Services, Inc.; considering the 49 Motion to Dismiss Deliberate Indifference Claims filed by Dr. Devere, D.D.S as a motion for summary judgment and granting it; granting the 60 Motion for Summary Judgm ent filed by James Rubenstein and Thomas McBride; dismissing Plaintiff's retaliation claim; remanding this matter to the magistrate judge for further proceedings with respect to Plaintiff's claims against CMS and Ms. Westfall. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 3/18/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
February 26, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 70 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: recommending that the District Court grant the 22 MOTION by Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Mary Westfall, and Dr. Devere, DDS to Dismiss; deny the 46 MOTION by Correctional Medical Services, Inc. to D ismiss Deliberate Indifference Claims Against Correctional Medical Services; consider the 49 MOTION by Dr. Devere, DDS to Dismiss Deliberate Indifference Claims and Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANT it; grant 60 MOTION by James Rubenstein and Thomas McBride for Summary Judgment; dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint against Dr. DeVere and the State Defendants; dismiss Plaintiff's retaliation claim, and REMAND this matter to Magistrate Judge VanDervort for further proceedings with respe ct to Plaintiff's claims against Correctional Medical Services and Ms. Westfall and consideration of whether their policies and practices were unconstitutional. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 3/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 2/26/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green v. Rubenstein et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jack Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Rubenstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas McBride
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Westfall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Devere, D.D.S
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?