Davis v. Craig
5:2007cv00960 |
December 26, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Beckley Office |
Thomas E. Johnston |
R. Clarke VanDervort |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Petitioiner's 11 Objections are overruled; the Court ADOPTS the 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendation, DISMISSES the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove the matter from the docket. A separate Judgment Order will enter this day implementing the rulings contained herein. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 6/2/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls) Modified on 6/3/2009 to add additional text (cds). |
Filing 10 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: recommending that the District Court DISMISS Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and remove this matter from the Court's docket. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 5/8/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 4/22/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Davis v. Craig | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.