Casey v. Orman et al
| Adam Nicholas Casey |
| Orman, Bonita Bowman, Bowdway, Koch, Jack, Harding, Gershen, Foster and Honaker |
| 5:2008cv01373 |
| December 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Raleigh |
| Thomas E. Johnston |
| R. Clarke VanDervort |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: adopting the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations; dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint, titled "Motion for Equitable Emergency Injunction Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983; Writ of "Habeas Corpus" Pursuant to ___ U.S.C.A. Section 2241; and Criminal Complaints Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. Section 242; dismissing this matter from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 9/9/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
|
Filing
5
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: recommending that the District Court DISMISS Plaintiff's 1 MOTION for Equitable Emergency Injunction Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983; Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 and Criminal Com plaints Pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C.A. Section 242. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 8/28/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 8/12/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
