Petri v. D. Berkebile, Warden

Petri v. D. Berkebile, Warden

Plaintiff:	David A. Petri
Defendant:	D. Berkebile, Warden
Case Number:	5:2009cv00361
Filed:	April 14, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County:	Raleigh
Presiding Judge:	Thomas E. Johnston
Presiding Judge:	R. Clarke VanDervort
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 3, 2009	Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge VanDervort's 14 Proposed Findings and Recommendation in its entirety, DISMISSES Petitioner's 1 Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice; and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this action from the Court's active docket. A separate judgment order will enter this day, implementing the rulings contained herein. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 11/3/2009. (cc: USMJ VanDervort; attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)
October 6, 2009	Filing 14 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the District Court grant 13 MOTION by David A. Petri to Voluntarily Withdraw and Dismiss His Petition; dismiss Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) without prejudice , and remove this matter from the Court's docket. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 10/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 10/6/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) Modified on 10/7/2009 to correct date objections to PF&R are due (cds).

Date Filed

Document Text

November 3, 2009

Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge VanDervort's 14 Proposed Findings and Recommendation in its entirety, DISMISSES Petitioner's 1 Writ of Habeas Corpus without prejudice; and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this action from the Court's active docket. A separate judgment order will enter this day, implementing the rulings contained herein. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 11/3/2009. (cc: USMJ VanDervort; attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)

October 6, 2009

Filing 14 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that the District Court grant 13 MOTION by David A. Petri to Voluntarily Withdraw and Dismiss His Petition; dismiss Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) without prejudice , and remove this matter from the Court's docket. This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort. Objections to Proposed F&R due by 10/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 10/6/2009. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) Modified on 10/7/2009 to correct date objections to PF&R are due (cds).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Petri v. D. Berkebile, Warden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: David A. Petri
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: D. Berkebile, Warden
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?