Central West Virginia Energy Company, Inc. et al v. Mountain State Carbon, LLC et al
Central West Virginia Energy Company, Inc. |
Mountain State Carbon, LLC and Severstal Wheeling, Inc. |
5:2009cv00467 |
April 29, 2009 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Beckley Office |
Raleigh |
Thomas E. Johnston |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 181 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: denying Defendant OAO Severstal's 103 MOTION to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint; denying Defendant Severstal Wheeling, Inc. and Defendant Severstal North America, Inc.'s 105 JOINT MOTION to Dismiss C ounts VI and VII of the Third Amended Complaint;denying as moot 85 MOTION to Dismiss; denying as moot 87 MOTION to Dismiss; denying as moot 89 MOTION to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 3/30/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) |
Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' 29 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED; this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; A separate judgment order will be entered this d ay; Further, Plaintiffs' 14 MOTION to Seal is GRANTED, Defendants' 19 MOTION to Substitute Counsel is GRANTED; and Plaintiffs' 39 MOTION to Seal is GRANTED; All other outstanding motions are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 3/31/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.