McClung v. United States of America

McClung v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Glenn Allen McClung
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	5:2009cv01548
Filed:	December 28, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Beckley Office
County:	Raleigh
Presiding Judge:	Irene C. Berger
Presiding Judge:	R. Clarke VanDervort
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 12, 2010	Filing 10 ORDER: striking the September 27, 2010, 9 LETTER, written and submitted by Howell W. Woltz, TEP, from the record; directing the Clerk to strike from the record any subsequent filings from Mr. Woltz on behalf of the Petitioner, as such filings would represent the unauthorized practice of law. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 10/12/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
October 1, 2010	Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; DIRECTS that the Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of H abeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 and Section 9 of Article 1 of the United States Constitution be DISMISSED; the Court further DIRECTS that this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket; and DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 10/1/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 12, 2010

Filing 10 ORDER: striking the September 27, 2010, 9 LETTER, written and submitted by Howell W. Woltz, TEP, from the record; directing the Clerk to strike from the record any subsequent filings from Mr. Woltz on behalf of the Petitioner, as such filings would represent the unauthorized practice of law. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 10/12/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)

October 1, 2010

Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; DIRECTS that the Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of H abeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 and Section 9 of Article 1 of the United States Constitution be DISMISSED; the Court further DIRECTS that this matter be REMOVED from the Court's docket; and DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 10/1/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McClung v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Glenn Allen McClung
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?