Deluca v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Deluca v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Plaintiff:	Kenneth Deluca
Defendant:	Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Case Number:	5:2010cv00421
Filed:	March 31, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Beckley Office
Presiding Judge:	Irene C. Berger
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 2, 2011	Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the Court Directs that Plaintiff's 28 MOTION for Fees and Costs Incurred as a Result of Defendants' Removal be GRANTED, and that Plaintiffs are hereby awarded Five Thousand Si x Hundred Fifteen Dollars ($5,615.00). The Court further Directs that Defendants pay this amount to Plaintiffs within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 3/2/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)
May 26, 2010	Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND REMAND ORDER: granting in part Plaintiffs' 8 MOTION to Remand to Circuit Court; remanding this case to the Circuit Court of Raleigh County for further proceedings; directing Plaintiffs to file any Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees and Costs, along with a memorandum in support, by 6/25/2010; directing Defendants to file any opposition or other response by 7/9/2010; directing Plaintiffs to file any reply by 7/23/2010. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 5/26/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party; Raleigh County Circuit Clerk) (slr)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 2, 2011

Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated herein, the Court Directs that Plaintiff's 28 MOTION for Fees and Costs Incurred as a Result of Defendants' Removal be GRANTED, and that Plaintiffs are hereby awarded Five Thousand Si x Hundred Fifteen Dollars ($5,615.00). The Court further Directs that Defendants pay this amount to Plaintiffs within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 3/2/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)

May 26, 2010

Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND REMAND ORDER: granting in part Plaintiffs' 8 MOTION to Remand to Circuit Court; remanding this case to the Circuit Court of Raleigh County for further proceedings; directing Plaintiffs to file any Motion for an Award of Attorney Fees and Costs, along with a memorandum in support, by 6/25/2010; directing Defendants to file any opposition or other response by 7/9/2010; directing Plaintiffs to file any reply by 7/23/2010. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 5/26/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party; Raleigh County Circuit Clerk) (slr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deluca v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Deluca
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?