Ball v. Baker
Plaintiff: Cheryl Ball
Defendant: Chris Baker, Roger Sheppard and James Childers
Case Number: 5:2010cv00955
Filed: July 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Beckley Office
County: Greenbrier
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does hereby ORDER that the Interveanor's 43 MOTION for Declaratory Judgment be GRANTED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 12/11/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
September 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 47 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court does ORDER that the 30 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Roger Sheppard, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Greenbrier County and James Childers, in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Greenbrier County, be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; the Court finds that geniune issues of material fact exist to preclude summary judgment in favor of Defendants as to Plaintiff's negligent hiring and training claims; the C ourt ORDERS that the 33 MOTION to Exclude Patrick J. Welsh, filed by Defendants Roger Sheppard, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Greenbrier County, and James Childers, in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Greenbrier County be DENIED; the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff make her expert available for deposition no later than 60 days following the issuance of this order. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 9/18/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
February 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: granting the Intervenor's 26 MOTION for Leave to Intervene to Assert Declaratory Judgment Complaint; directing the Clerk to FILE the Intervenor's Complaint for Declaratory Judgment; ordering that the deadlines established by the 9 Scheduling Order be SUSPENDED pending resolution of the coverage issue relating to Defendant Baker. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 2/7/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ball v. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl Ball
Represented By: Michael O. Callaghan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chris Baker
Represented By: George J. Joseph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger Sheppard
Represented By: Wendy E. Greve
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Childers
Represented By: Wendy E. Greve
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?