Addair v. American Optical Corporation
Plaintiff: Danny Addair
Defendant: American Optical Corporation
Case Number: 5:2010cv00997
Filed: August 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Beckley Office
County: Kanawha
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 77 U.S.C. ยง 7777
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 90 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND REMAND ORDER: For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's 42 MOTION to Remand is GRANTED. The Court hereby REMANDS this case to the Circuit Court of Wyoming County, West Virginia, for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 6/7/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mls)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Addair v. American Optical Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danny Addair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Optical Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?