Duncan v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
| Elisabeth Duncan |
| JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 5:2010cv01049 |
| August 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Raleigh |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Based on the foregoing, the Court does hereby ORDER the Defendant Chase Bank, USA, N.A.'s 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment be DENIED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 11/04/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Duncan v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Elisabeth Duncan | |
| Represented By: | Christopher B. Frost |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Angela L. Beblo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
