Walker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| Jason Lee Walker |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
| 5:2011cv00529 |
| August 8, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Wyoming |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court does ORDER that Plaintiff's 66 MOTION for Leave to Amend Complaint be DENIED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 6/14/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court does ORDER that the 50 MOTION to Renew Defendant's MOTION for Summary Judgment and the Defendant's 42 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED; the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's 51 MOTION for Summary Judgment be DENIED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 2/11/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's 27 MOTION Regarding Sufficiency of Objections to Plaintiff's Requests for Admissions and Plaintiff's 32 MOTION to Compel Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Interrog atories and Requests for Production of Documents are DENIED; it is ORDERED that Defendant's 37 MOTION to Quash Notice of Second Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 4/5/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
