Handy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et. al.
| Kyle Handy |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Old Republic Insurance Company |
| 5:2015cv01950 |
| February 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Raleigh |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
107
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ORDERS that State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company's 104 Objections to Memorandum Opinion and Order Entered February 11, 2016 be OVERRULED and that the 103 MOTION to Stay Magistrate Judge's Memorandum Opinion and Order Entered February 11, 2016 be DENIED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 3/3/2016. (cc: Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Based on the discussion herein, State Farm's 63 MOTION for Protective Order is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 2/11/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's 32 MOTION to Compel Old Republic Insurance Company to Respond to Discovery; Plaintiff shall have through and including 2/15/16 to file his Affidavit and supporting documentation for fees and expenses; defendant shall have 14 days to file a response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/12/2016. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (cds)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
