Jenkins v. Young
Norman R. Jenkins |
D. L. Young |
5:2016cv04296 |
May 10, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Beckley Office |
Raleigh |
Irene C. Berger |
Cheryl A. Eifert |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: adopting the 14 Proposed Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge; denying the Petitioner's 1 Application Under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus; granting the Respondent's 12 request for dismissal; dismissing this action with prejudice and removing it from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 10/3/2017. (cc: Magistrate Judge Eifert; attys; any unrepresented party) (btm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jenkins v. Young | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Norman R. Jenkins | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: D. L. Young | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.