O'Neal et al v. Wisen et al
Plaintiff: Jeffrey O'Neal and Sherrie O'Neal
Defendant: Richard Wisen and G. Russell Rollyson, Jr.
Cross_claimant: G. Russell Rollyson, Jr.
Cross_defendant: Richard Wisen
Case Number: 5:2016cv08597
Filed: September 6, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office: Beckley Office
County: Raleigh
Presiding Judge: Irene C. Berger
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: granting Plaintiffs' 32 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Upon Plaintiffs' First Claim for Relief; denying Defendant G. Russel Rollyson, Jr.'s 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Defendant Richard Wisen's 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 8/1/2017. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (btm)
February 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: After thorough review and careful consideration, the Court ORDERS that the 11 and 13 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss under FRCP 12(b) by Defendant, Richard Wisen be DENIED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 2/28/2017. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Neal et al v. Wisen et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey O'Neal
Represented By: Gary M. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherrie O'Neal
Represented By: Gary M. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Wisen
Represented By: James G. Anderson, III
Represented By: G. Todd Houck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Russell Rollyson, Jr.
Represented By: Charles R. Bailey
Represented By: Michael W. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_claimant: G. Russell Rollyson, Jr.
Represented By: Charles R. Bailey
Represented By: Michael W. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Cross_defendant: Richard Wisen
Represented By: James G. Anderson, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?