Boggs, et al v. Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, et al
| Holly D. Boggs and Russell Boggs |
| Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Integon National Insurance Company, National General Insurance Company and Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. |
| 5:2017cv04239 |
| October 30, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Greenbrier |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4001 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Granting the 39 Renewed Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), and the 69 Joinder of Torrent Technologies, Inc. in Motions to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Ci vil Procedure 12(b)(6) Filed by Imperial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Integon National Insurance Company, and National General Insurance Company; granting Defendant Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc.'s 38 Renewed Motion to Dismiss with Sup plemental Authority and Answer to First Amended Complaint and dismissing all claims against Rimkus Consulting Group; terminating as moot the 16 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Defendant Rimkus Consulting Groups, Inc.'s 22 Motion to Dismiss, filed in relation to the complaint. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 8/17/2018. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
