Barnett v. Young

Plaintiff: Robert H. Barnett
Defendant: David L. Young
Case Number: 5:2018cv00279
Filed: February 8, 2018
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Beckley Office
County: Raleigh
Presiding Judge: Irene C. Berger
Referring Judge: Cheryl A. Eifert
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 12, 2018 21 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Adopting the 17 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge and denying the 6 Motion for "prohibitory injunction," filed by Robert H. Barnett; directing that this action remain referred Magistrate Judge Eifert for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 7/12/2018. (cc: Magistrate Judge Eifert; attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnett v. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert H. Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David L. Young
Represented By: John L. File
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?