F. A. v. Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc. et al

Plaintiff: F. A.
Defendant: Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc., Thair Barghouthi, John Does 1 through 10, Doe General Hospital, Cardinal Health 414, LLC and West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources
Case Number: 5:2018cv00284
Filed: February 9, 2018
Court: West Virginia Southern District Court
Office: Beckley Office
County: Raleigh
Presiding Judge: Irene C. Berger
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 2, 2018 26 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Granting Plaintiff's 4 MOTION to Remand to Circuit Court as to remand and denying the motion as to the request for attorneys' fees; remanding this case to the Circuit Court of Raleigh County for further proceedings; terminating as moot any other pending motions. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 4/2/2018. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party; Clerk-Raleigh County Circuit Court) (msa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: F. A. v. Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: F. A.
Represented By: Stephen P. New
Represented By: Amanda J. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raleigh Heart Clinic, Inc.
Represented By: Shereen S. Compton
Represented By: Amy Rothman Malone
Represented By: Don R. Sensabaugh, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thair Barghouthi
Represented By: Shereen S. Compton
Represented By: Amy Rothman Malone
Represented By: Don R. Sensabaugh, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1 through 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Doe General Hospital
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cardinal Health 414, LLC
Represented By: Cheryl A. Falvey
Represented By: Christopher D. Smith
Represented By: Marc E. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources
Represented By: Kimberly M. Bandy
Represented By: Caleb B. David
Represented By: Natalie C. Schaefer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?