Hinkle v. Azar
| Lawrence E. Hinkle and Bryan Hinkle |
| Alex M. Azar, II |
| 5:2019cv00595 |
| August 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Irene C Berger |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (btm) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Alex M. Azar, II, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachments: #1 Summons - Michael B. Stuart, United States Attorney, #2 Summons - William Barr, United States Attorney General) (btm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7351394. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons - Alex M. Azar, II, #2 Proposed Summons - Michael B. Stuart, #3 Proposed Summons - William Barr, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (btm) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Irene C. Berger. (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
