Williams v. Weaver
Plaintiff: Malik Wiliams and Malik Williams
Defendant: Jason Weaver
Case Number: 5:2019cv00629
Filed: August 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: Irene C Berger
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 APPLICATION by Malik Williams to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs (Attachments: #1 Envelopes) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (btm)
September 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing that Plaintiff's #4 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs be returned to Plaintiff, that Plaintiff submit a complete Application including all information contained in the Certificate portion of the Application, and return such to the Court by 10/17/2019; advising that, in the alternative to fully completing the Application, Plaintiff may pay the Court's $400.00 filing fee; further advising that failure of the Plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file a properly completed Application by 10/17/2019 will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this matter without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 9/17/2019. (cc: Plaintiff - pro se, with #4 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs) (btm)
September 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 APPLICATION by Malik Williams to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (btm)
September 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER directing that Plaintiff shall either pay the filing and administrative fee totaling $400 or file an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by 10/4/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 9/5/2019. (cc: Plaintiff - pro se with blank Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis) (btm)
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Judge Irene C. Berger. (klc)
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (btm)
August 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT, with Affidavit in Support of Claim for Damage and Injury. (btm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malik Wiliams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malik Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jason Weaver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?