Crum v. Warden et al
| David Hall Crum |
| Warden, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden D. L. Young, Ms. O'Dell, Unit Manager Ms. Stimpson and Case Manager Jim Craddock |
| 5:2020cv00655 |
| October 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| Frank W Volk |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #10 AMENDED COMPLAINT by David Hall Crum. ERROR: Current FILED stamp omitted. CORRECTION: Added "FILED" stamp to reflect that the document was filed on 11/2/2020, pursuant to the Court's order. (slr)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED COMPLAINT by David Hall Crum against Warden D. L. Young, Case Manager Jim Craddock, Supervisor Case Manager Ms. O'Dell, and Unit Manager Ms. Stimpson. (msa) (Modified on 11/3/2020 to remove and replace image) (slr).
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting Plaintiff's #8 MOTION to Amend Complaint; directing the Clerk to docket Plaintiff's [8-1] Proposed Amended Complaint; directing the Clerk to modify the docket sheet to reflect the defendants as identified in Plaintiff's Amended Complaint; specifically, the docket sheet should reflect the following as Defendants: (1) Warden D.L. Young; (2) Case Manager Jim Craddock; (3) Supervisor Case Manager Ms. O'Dell; and (4) Unit Manager Ms. Stimpson; the Clerk should terminate the "Warden" and "Federal Bureau of Prisons" as Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 11/2/2020. (cc: pro se Plaintiff) (msa)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION by David Hall Crum to Amend The Civil Action Pursuant to Bivens, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S. Ct. 1999, 24 L. Ed. 619 (1971). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint). Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (msa)
|
|
Filing 7
APPLICATION by David Hall Crum to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (msa)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing that Plaintiff has until 11/06/2020, to amend his #2 Complaint to specifically set forth his constitutional claims and state specific facts as to how each defendant violated his constitutional rights; directing the Clerk to mail to Plaintiff a copy of this Order and a form Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 10/8/2020. (cc: Plaintiff w/form Complaint) (msa)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER as to David Hall Crum: finding that the #1 APPLICATION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is deficient as such does not contain certification by a prison official as to the amount of funds in Plaintiff's account; directing Plaintiff to either pay the filing and administrative fee totaling $400 or file an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by 11/06/2020; directing the Clerk to mail Plaintiff a copy of this Order and a blank Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 10/8/2020. (cc: Plaintiff w/blank IFP) (msa)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
|
|
Filing 3
COPIES of Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Bivens Complaint mailed separate from originals by David Hall Crum. (msa)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT. (msa)
|
|
Filing 1
MOTION to Thereby Proceed in Forma Pauperis by David Hall Crum. (msa)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
