Parrish v. Young
Jaron Parrish |
D. L. Young |
5:2020cv00710 |
October 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Omar J Aboulhosn |
Frank W Volk |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER AND NOTICE directing that if Petitioner chooses to file a reply in opposition to the Respondent's #10 Response, it shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court by 1/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 12/17/2020. (cc: Petitioner - pro se; counsel of record) (btm) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE by D. L. Young in opposition to #6 Order (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Cremeans, Courtney) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE and Request for Service by Courtney Lucille Cremeans on behalf of D. L. Young. (Cremeans, Courtney) |
Filing 8 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from D.L. Young, FCI Beckley re: #6 Order. Signed by (illegible) on 11/09/2020. (msa) |
Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from the United States Attorney re: #6 Order. Signed by Robin Justice on 11/9/2020. (msa) |
Filing 6 ORDER: directing Respondent to file an Answer to the allegations contained in Petitioner's #1 Section 2241 Petition by 12/17/2020, and show cause, if any, why the Writ of Habeas Corpus sought by Petitioner in this case should not be granted; Petitioner may file a Reply or Objections to Respondents Answer by 1/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 11/5/2020. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt-DLYoung, #2 Certified Mail Receipt-USA) (cc: Respondent and United States Attorney, Post Office Box 1713, Charleston, West Virginia 25326-1713, by certified mail w/#1 Petition and #2 Memorandum in Support; Petitioner-pro se) (msa) |
Filing 5 FILING FEE: $5, Receipt Number CHAR018261. (slr) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee with Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (msa) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM by Jaron Parrish in support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (msa) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Jaron Parrish against D. L. Young pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (msa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Parrish v. Young | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: D. L. Young | |
Represented By: | Courtney Lucille Cremeans |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Jaron Parrish | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.