Moore v. Young
| Ethan Jerome Moore |
| David L. Young |
| 5:2020cv00857 |
| December 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| Frank W Volk |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER directing the Respondent to answer or otherwise respond to the Petition within 60 days of the entry of this Order showing cause, if Respondent has any, why the relief sought by Petitioner should not be granted; directing that Petitioner may, if he wishes, file a reply to the answer or response of the Respondent within 60 days after service of same by the Respondent; directing the Clerk to provide a copy of this Order to Petitioner and a copy of the Order and #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus to the U. S. Attorney for the Southern District of West Virginia. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 1/27/2021. (cc: Petitioner; U. S. Attorney, Southern District of West Virginia, with copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) (slr)
|
|
Filing 7
FILING FEE: $5.00, Receipt Number 5BECK005077. (slr)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting Petitioner's #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Send Filing Fee; Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of this Order, to either pay the requisite five dollar filing fee or submit to the Court an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 1/8/2021. (cc: Petitioner with second Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs) (btm)
|
|
Filing 5
LETTER-FORM MOTION by Ethan Jerome Moore for Extension of Time to Send Filing Fee. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert. (btm)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE with Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (msa)
|
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM by Ethan Jerome Moore in support of #1 Petition to Title 28 U.S.C. 2241. (msa)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Ethan Jerome Moore against David L. Young pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (msa)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moore v. Young | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ethan Jerome Moore | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: David L. Young | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
