Rankins v. Young
Petitioner: Michael Rankins
Respondent: D. L. Young
Case Number: 5:2021cv00132
Filed: February 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Referring Judge: Frank W Volk
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER directing that Petitioner shall have sixty (60) days the date of service of the same to file a response to the #7 motion to dismiss; following service of Petitioner's response, if such is filed, Respondent shall have fourteen days within which to reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 4/13/2021. (cc: Petitioner, counsel of record) (msa)
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by D. L. Young (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Bailey, Jason)
March 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing Respondent to answer or otherwise respond to the #2 Petition within 60 days of the entry of this Order showing cause, if any, why the relief sought by Petitioner should not be granted; Petitioner may, if he wishes, file a reply to the answer or response of the Respondent within 60 days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 3/30/2021. (cc: Petitioner; United States Attorney for the SDWV with copy of #2 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus) (btm)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 5BECK005130. (btm)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER directing Petitioner to pay the filing fee of five dollars, or submit to the Court a fully completed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs, which includes the facility certificate. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 3/5/2021. (cc: Petitioner with Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs) (btm)
March 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Michael Rankins against D. L. Young pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (btm)
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 APPLICATION by Michael Rankins to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (btm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rankins v. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: D. L. Young
Represented By: Jason S. Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael Rankins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?