Feather-Gorbey v. Vest et al
| (Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey |
| Edwards, Vest, Fain, Williams, Co. Raban and John or Jane Doe |
| 5:2021cv00354 |
| June 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Thomas E Johnston |
| Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
DISMISSAL ORDER The #1 Application to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs is DENIED, and the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; directing the Clerk remove this case from the Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 7/12/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERK'S ORDER. For reasons appearing to the court, this case is reassigned to Judge Thomas E. Johnston for all pretrial and trial proceedings. Signed by Clerk of Court Rory L. Perry II on 6/23/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm)
|
|
Filing 2
COMPLAINT. (btm)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION by Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (btm)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
