Mathews v. Young
Defendant: D. L. Young
Petitioner: Alec V. Mathews
Case Number: 5:2021cv00396
Filed: July 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: Frank W Volk
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 LETTER to Alec V. Mathews, from Rory L. Perry II dated 9/1/2021, re: #10 letter requesting copy of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (klc)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 LETTER to Clerk of Court, from Alec V. Mathews dated 8/23/2021, re: Requesting a copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (msa)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER directing that Petitioner may file a Reply to the #8 Response to Order to Show Cause by 9/13/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 8/13/2021. (cc: Petitioner, counsel of record) (msa)
August 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by D. L. Young, re: #5 Order. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Bailey, Jason) (Modified on 8/12/2021to add link to #5 order) (mkw).
July 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney re: #5 Order. Signed by Robin Justice on 7/15/2021. (arb)
July 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from D. L. Young, Warden, on 7/15/2021, re: #5 Order. (arb)
July 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing Respondent to file an Answer to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) by 8/19/2021 showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 9/20/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 7/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 Warden Young Certified Mail Receipt, #2 U. S. Attorney Certified Mail Receipt) (cc: Petitioner, pro se; Respondent and USA w/2241 Petition) (arb)
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
July 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 5BECK005218. (msa)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) with Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (msa)
July 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Alec V. Mathews against D. L. Young pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (msa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mathews v. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alec V. Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D. L. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?