Farmer v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
Plaintiff: Diana M. Farmer
Defendant: Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC and Philips RS North America, LLC
Case Number: 5:2021cv00428
Filed: July 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Frank W Volk
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2021 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #11 ORDER. ERROR: Image not flattened. CORRECTION: Replaced with flattened image. (msa)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER directing that this case is stayed and RETIRED to the inactive docket pending the MDL decision on a conditional transfer order; in the event the MDL panel decides not to grant the motion to transfer or not to file a conditional transfer order in the case, the parties are directed inform the Court within 15 days of the MDL panel decision. Signed by Judge Frank W. Volk on 9/1/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (msa) Modified on 9/7/2021 to remove and replace image. (msa).
September 1, 2021 Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Philips North America LLC in support of #8 UNOPPOSED MOTION by Philips North America LLC to Stay Proceedings Pending a Decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on a Motion to Transfer. (mk)
September 1, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Aaron N. Arthur on behalf of Philips North America LLC. (Arthur, Aaron)
September 1, 2021 Filing 8 UNOPPOSED MOTION by Philips North America LLC to Stay Proceedings Pending a Decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on a Motion to Transfer (Attachment: #2 Exhibit A)(Luxton, Steven) (Modified on 9/1/2021 to remove attachment #1 memorandum in support) (mk).
September 1, 2021 Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Philips North America LLC (Luxton, Steven)
September 1, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by Steven A. Luxton on behalf of Philips North America LLC. (Luxton, Steven)
September 1, 2021 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #8 Unopposed Motion by Philips North America LLC to Stay Proceedings Pending a Decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on a Motion to Transfer. ERROR: Memorandum in Support attached as exhibit. CORRECTION: Memorandum in Support removed and filed separately. (mk)
August 23, 2021 Filing 5 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Georgiana Boss on behalf of Diana M. Farmer. Local counsel: Harry G. Deitzler. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8016718. (Attachments: #1 WV State Bar PHV admission)(Deitzler, Harry)
August 23, 2021 Filing 4 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Michael A. London on behalf of Diana M. Farmer. Local counsel: Harry Deitzler. Fee $50.00. Receipt # BWVSDC-8016600. (London, Michael)
August 2, 2021 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm)
August 2, 2021 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachments: #1 Summons - Philips North America LLC, #2 Summons - Philips RS North America LLC) (btm)
July 30, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8000940. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons Koninklijke Philips N.V., #2 Proposed Summons Philips North America LLC, #3 Proposed Summons Philips RS North America LLC, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (btm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farmer v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana M. Farmer
Represented By: Anthony J. Majestro
Represented By: Harry G. Deitzler
Represented By: James C. Peterson
Represented By: Georgiana Boss
Represented By: Michael A. London
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Koninklijke Philips N.V.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philips North America LLC
Represented By: Aaron N. Arthur
Represented By: Steven A. Luxton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Philips RS North America, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?