Maldonado v. Carvajal et al
Garcia Feliz Maldonado |
Michael D. Carvajal, J. C. Petrucc, D. L. Young and Ball |
5:2021cv00514 |
September 13, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Omar J Aboulhosn |
Frank W Volk |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 APPLICATION by Garcia Feliz Maldonado to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (msa) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing that Plaintiff shall either pay the filing and administrative fee totaling $402 or file an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by 10/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 9/14/2021. (cc: Plaintiff - Pro se with blank Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis) (btm) |
CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (msa) |
Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Tyrone Cross, filed on behalf of Garcia Feliz Maldonado re: #1 Complaint. (msa) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT of Michael Rankins, dated 8/30/2021, filed on behalf of Garcia Feliz Maldonado re: #1 Complaint. (msa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. (msa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.