Thompson v. Raleigh General Hospital, LLC et al
| Cynthia Thompson |
| Raleigh General Hospital, LLC and Scanstat Technologies, LLC |
| 5:2021cv00605 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| John T Copenhaver |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER AND NOTICE: Motions under F.R. Civ. P. 12(b) - 2/3/2022. Last day for Rule 26(f) Meeting - 2/14/2022. Last day to file Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - 2/21/2022. Scheduling Conference at 10:00 AM on 2/25/2022 at the Robert C. Byrd United States Courthouse in Charleston, before the undersigned, unless canceled. Entry of Scheduling Order - 3/4/2022. Last day to serve F.R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) disclosures - 3/11/2022. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 1/14/2022. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (mfo)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL With Prejudice by Cynthia Thompson (Taylor, Amanda) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Scanstat Technologies, LLC in support of #8 MOTION by Scanstat Technologies, LLC to Dismiss With Prejudice. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit 1 to Exhibit A - Affidavit)(Sharma, Esha) |
| Filing 8 MOTION by Scanstat Technologies, LLC to Dismiss With Prejudice. (Sharma, Esha) |
| RESET ANSWER DEADLINE for Scanstat Technologies, LLC to 1/21/2022 pursuant to #7 Stipulation. (mk) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME for Scanstat Technologies, LLC to respond to #1 Complaint to January 21, 2022 by Scanstat Technologies, LLC, Cynthia Thompson (Sharma, Esha) (Modified on 1/4/2022 to add link to #1 complaint and add parties) (mk). |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S ORDER. For reasons appearing to the court, this action is reassigned from Judge Frank W. Volk to Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. Signed by Clerk of Court Rory L. Perry II on 12/27/2021. (cc: Judge Volk; Judge Copenhaver; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME for Raleigh General Hospital to answer or otherwise respond or plead to #1 Complaint to January 21, 2022 by Raleigh General Hospital, LLC, Cynthia Thompson (Cokeley, Bryan) (Modified on 12/22/2021 to add party filer) (mk). |
| RESET ANSWER DEADLINE for Raleigh General Hospital, LLC to 1/21/2022 pursuant to #5 Stipulation. (mk) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE on 12/1/2021 as to Raleigh General Hospital, LLC. Certified Mail Number: 92148901125134100003368469. (msa) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Raleigh General Hospital, LLC, Scanstat Technologies, LLC, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachment: #1 Summons - Scanstat Technologies, LLC) (btm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # BWVSDC-8080753. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Proposed Summons - Raleigh General Hospital, LLC, #3 Proposed Summons - Scanstat Technologies, LLC, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (btm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
