Melvin v. Heckard
Petitioner: Ryan Melvin
Respondent: K. Heckard
Case Number: 5:2022cv00199
Filed: April 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Cheryl A Eifert
Referring Judge: Frank W Volk
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 REPLY by Ryan Melvin to #8 Response to Order to Show Cause. (btm)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER directing that Petitioner shall have 60 days after service of the #8 Response to Order to Show Cause to file a reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 5/26/2022. (cc: Petitioner, counsel of record) (lca)
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by K. Heckard (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Arthur, Christopher)
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER directing Respondent to answer or otherwise respond to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) within 60 days of the entry of this Order showing cause, if any, why the relief sought should not be granted. Petitioner may file a reply to the answer within 60 days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 5/17/2022. (cc: Petitioner; USA w/2241 Petition) (arb)
May 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 5BECK005430. (mfo)
May 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Petitioner's #4 APPLICATION to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs; finding that Petitioner is clearly financially able to pay the $5.00 filing fee necessary to pursue 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition; directing Petitioner to pay the filing fee on or before 6/3/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 5/3/2022. (cc: Petitioner) (msa)
May 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 APPLICATION by Ryan Melvin to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert. (btm)
April 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (msa)
April 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Ryan Melvin against K. Heckard pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (msa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Melvin v. Heckard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ryan Melvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: K. Heckard
Represented By: Christopher R. Arthur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?