Eskridge et al v. West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation et al
| Billy Mason Eskridge, Bryant Carr and Charles Lane |
| West Virginia Dept. of Correctional Rehabilitation and U.S. Marshals Service |
| 5:2022cv00223 |
| May 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| Frank W Volk |
| Prisoner - (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER notifying the Plaintiff Eskridge that if he wishes to proceed with his Section 1983 and Bivens claims, he should amend his letter-form Complaint to exclude Plaintiffs Carr and Lane as Plaintiffs; the Clerk is directed to open a new civil action as to each Plaintiff and terminate Plaintiffs Carr and Lane in this civil action; each Plaintiff has until 6/17/2022, to file a separate Amended Complaint naming "persons" as defendants; Plaintiffs have until 6/17/2022 to pay the filing fee or file an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees by 6/17/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 5/16/2022. (cc: Plaintiffs w/ enclosures) (lca)
|
| CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. (btm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
