Prigmore v. FCI Beaumont Staff
| William Prigmore |
| FCI Beaumont Staff, Warden Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP and Multiple Contractors and Outside Visitors to FBOP |
| 5:2022cv00331 |
| August 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| Frank W Volk |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: #9 Order. ERROR/CORRECTION: Image removed due to incorrect event used; Order refiled using proper event at ECF #11. (ts) |
| Filing 10 CONFIRMATION from Eastern District of Texas that the case has been opened in that district as 1:22-cv-00418, filed 09/30/2022. (kew) |
Filing 11
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: Directing that this matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont Division, for further consideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 9/29/2022. (cc: Plaintiff) (ts)
|
| Filing 9 INCORRECT ENTRY; IMAGE REMOVED. (Modified on 10/3/2022 to remove image due to incorrect event used) (ts). |
| Filing 8 IMAGE REMOVED. (msa) (Modified on 9/26/2022 to remove image pursuant to chambers) (ts). |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT by William Prigmore against Warden Bryan K. Dobbs, Multiple Unknown Agents of the BOP, Multiple Contractors and Outside Visitors to FBOP. (msa) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file by 10/6/2022, an Amended Complaint in this civil action concerning only allegations regarding incidents occurring at FCI Beaumont; the undersigned construes Plaintiff's #4 Complaint as an attempt to initiate a new civil action against FCI Hazelton Warden S. Brown and FCI Hazelton staff pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, and directs the Clerk to open a new civil action and include therein a copy of Plaintiff's #4 Complaint; if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with a Bivens action concerning incidents occurring at FCI Hazelton, Plaintiff shall file by 10/6/2022, the form Complaint specifying, among other things, the names of individual Defendant(s) in his Bivens action and stating specific facts as to how each defendant violated his constitutional rights during his placement at FCI Hazelton. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 9/7/2022. (cc: Plaintiff with two form Complaints) (btm)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION by William Prigmore Requesting Court to Intervene and Order Release or Specific Change in Detention Conditions. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (msa) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT. (msa) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm) |
|
Filing 2
COPY OF ORDER entered 8/8/2022, directing the Clerk to open a new civil action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 24 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), to include a copy of Plaintiff's "Motion Requesting Update and Court Order Change on Conditions of Confinement and Government Response", and to send Plaintiff a copy of a form Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 8/8/2022. (btm)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (originally filed as a Motion in Civil Action 5:22-cv-00117). (btm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
