Rubert v. Heckard
| Warden Katrina Heckard |
| Jose L. Rubert |
| 5:2022cv00597 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| Frank W Volk |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER denying Petitioner's #5 Motion to waive the filing fee and granting the motion for an extension; the Clerk of Court is directed to provide Petitioner with an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; Petitioner is directed to pay the filing fee or submit the completed Application within 30 days of the date of this Order; the Respondent is directed to provide Petitioner, within 10 days of the date of this Order, with a copy of his certified inmate account statement showing receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months of his incarceration at FCI Beckley,or if Petitioner has been there for less than six months, the entirety of his incarceration there; Petitioner shall attach the inmate account statement to his Application when he sends the completed Application to the Clerk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 1/18/2023. (cc: Petitioner with Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; Respondent) (btm)
|
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT OF FACT/MOTION by Jose L. Rubert for the Court to Waive the $5.00 filing fee, Grant an Extension in Order to Obtain an Application or forward an Application. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert. (msa) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER directing the Petitioner to either pay the $5.00 filing fee, or submit a completed Application; Plaintiff is notified that the failure to do one or the other, as instructed, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 12/30/2022. (cc: Petitioner) (ts)
|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Jose L. Rubert against Katrina Heckard pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (msa) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION by Jose L. Rubert to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (msa) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rubert v. Heckard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jose L. Rubert | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Warden Katrina Heckard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
