Scott v. Heckard
Roland Scott, Jr. |
Warden Katina Heckard |
5:2023cv00061 |
January 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Cheryl A Eifert |
Frank W Volk |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER directing that Petitioner shall have 60 days after service of the #12 Response in which to file a reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 3/20/2023. (cc: Petitioner; counsel of record) (btm) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Katina Heckard (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Arthur, Christopher) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying Petitioner's #3 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 2/16/2023. (cc: Petitioner; USA for the SDWV) (btm) |
Filing 10 LETTER to Roland Scott, from Rory L. Perry II dated 2/15/2023, re: #9 letter requesting filed stamped copy of Petition. (klc) |
Filing 9 LETTER to Clerk of Court, from Roland Scott dated 2/12/2023, re: request for a filed stamped copy of his #2 Petition. (msa) |
Filing 8 ORDER directing Respondent to answer or otherwise respond to the #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. 2241 within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Order showing cause, if Respondent has any, why the relief sought by Petitioner should not be granted; Petitioner may file a reply to the answer or response of the Respondent within sixty (60) days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 1/30/2023. (cc: Petitioner, USA w/Petition) (msa) |
Filing 7 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 5000126. (mfo) |
Filing 6 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE by Roland Scott, Jr. re: #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (msa) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) by Roland Scott, Jr. (msa) |
Filing 3 MOTION by Roland Scott, Jr. for Appointment of Counsel. (msa) |
Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Roland Scott, Jr. against Katina Heckard pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (msa) |
Filing 1 APPLICATION by Roland Scott, Jr. to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (Attachment: #1 Inmate Inquiry) (msa) (Modified attachment security on 1/26/2023) (msa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Scott v. Heckard | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Roland Scott, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Katina Heckard | |
Represented By: | Christopher R. Arthur |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.