United States of America v. $66,506.26 Seized from Truist, Account Number XX6412 et al
United States of America |
$66,506.26 Seized from Truist, Account Number XX6412, $55,049.44 Seized from Truist, Account Number XX3150, $23,541.50 Seized from Truist, Account Number XX0760 and $1,203,152.61 Frozen from TD Ameritrade XX3306 |
Ryan Bailey |
5:2023cv00406 |
May 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Frank W Volk |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
31 U.S.C. § 5317 Search and Forfeiture of Monetary Instruments |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME for Ryan Bailey to answer or otherwise respond to #1 Complaint to August 21, 2023 by United States of America, Ryan Bailey (Arthur, Christopher) (Modified on 6/23/2023 to add party filer and link to #1 complaint) (mk). |
SET ANSWER DEADLINE for Ryan Bailey to 8/21/2023 pursuant to #5 Stipulation. (mk) |
Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm) |
Filing 3 WARRANT OF ARREST AND NOTICE IN REM ISSUED. Original and 10 copies returned to Christopher R. Arthur. (btm) |
Filing 2 WARRANT OF ARREST AND NOTICE IN REM SUBMITTED by United States of America. (btm) |
Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN REM by United States of America. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (btm) |
CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.