Hicks v. Heckard
Petitioner: Eric Hicks
Respondent: Warden Katina Heckard
Case Number: 5:2023cv00581
Filed: August 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Dwane L Tinsley
Referring Judge: Frank W Volk
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 RESPONSE by Katina Heckard to the Court's #8 Order and Notice. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Bailey, Jason)
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney re: #8 Order and Notice, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). Signed for on 9/11/2023 by M. Wallace. (btm)
September 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER AND NOTICE directing that, by 11/7/2023, Respondent shall file an Answer to the allegations contained in Petitioner's #1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and accompanying #4 Motion to Waive Requirement to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, and to show cause, if any, why the writ of habeas corpus sought by Petitioner should not be granted; Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 12/7/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 9/7/2023. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt - Warden Katina Heckard, #2 Certified Mail Receipt - United States Attorney) (cc: Respondent and USA for the SDWV with Petitioner's #1 Petition by cert. mail, RRR; Petitioner) (btm)
September 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 5000299. (skm)
August 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (msa)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MOTION by Eric Hicks to Waive the Requirement to Exhaust Administrative Remedies. (Attachment: #1 Administrative Remedy Documentation) (msa)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT in Support of the Prison Litigation Reform Act "PLRA" dated 8/11/2023, by Eric Hicks. (msa)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION by Eric Hicks for Appointment of Counsel. (msa)
August 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Eric Hicks against Warden Katina Heckard pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (msa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hicks v. Heckard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eric Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Katina Heckard
Represented By: Jason S. Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?