Johnson v. United States of America
Petitioner: Aabrial L. Johnson
Respondent: United States of America and Warden Holzapfel
Case Number: 5:2023cv00602
Filed: September 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Dwane L Tinsley
Referring Judge: Frank W Volk
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 28, 2023 Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received re: #5 Order, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). Delivered to United States Attorney's Office on 9/28/2023. (jsa)
September 28, 2023 Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received re: #5 Order, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). Delivered to Warden Holzapfel on 9/28/2023. (jsa)
September 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER AND NOTICE directing that by 11/9/2023, Respondent shall file an Answer to the allegations contained in Petitioner's section 2241 and accompanying motion, and to show cause, if any, why the writ of habeas corpus sought by Petitioner should not be granted; Petitioner may file a Reply to Respondent's Answer by 12/8/2023; further directing the Clerk to modify the docket sheet to reflect that the current Warden at FCI Beckley is the proper respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 9/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 certified mail receipt as to Warden Holzapfel, #2 certified mail receipt as to United States Attorney) (cc: Petitioner; USA and Respondent via certified mail with copy of Petition) (jsa)
September 20, 2023 Filing 4 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 5000315. (msa)
September 11, 2023 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
September 8, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (msa)
September 8, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Aabrial L. Johnson against United States of America pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits (A)(1) - (A)(3), #2 Envelope) (msa)
September 8, 2023 CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Aabrial L. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Holzapfel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?