Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Tuhus
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC |
Melinda Ann Tuhus |
Rose Zheng Abramoff |
5:2023cv00625 |
September 19, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Frank W Volk |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 NOTICE of Filing of Waiver of Presence at Hearing on Preliminary Injunction by Consol Defendant Rose Zheng Abramoff, Defendant Melinda Ann Tuhus. (DePaulo, William) |
Filing 18 REPLY by Rose Zheng Abramoff, Melinda Ann Tuhus to #16 Response In Opposition. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit)(DePaulo, William) |
Filing 17 ORDER upon pre-hearing conference held 9/29/2023; the Court directed counsel for both parties to meet at the earliest possible occasion to provide the Court with the earliest date possible as to a preliminary injunction hearing; if the parties are unable to agree on a single date, the parties are instructed to provide the Court with several dates that are agreeable to all sides; counsel for both parties is directed to provide the Court with a list of stipulations or time saving measures as to exhibits the parties are willing to enter into jointly for the preliminary injunction hearing; counsel for the Defendants is instructed to provide written waivers of presence by Ms. Tuhus and Ms. Abramoff if approved. Signed by Judge Frank W. Volk on 10/17/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (btm) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE by Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC in opposition to #14 MOTION by Rose Zheng Abramoff, Melinda Ann Tuhus for Abstention re: #1 Complaint (Miller, Timothy) |
Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Rose Zheng Abramoff, Melinda Ann Tuhus in support of #14 MOTION by Rose Zheng Abramoff, Melinda Ann Tuhus for Abstention re: 1 Complaint. (DePaulo, William) |
Filing 14 MOTION by Rose Zheng Abramoff, Melinda Ann Tuhus for Abstention re: #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(DePaulo, William) (Modified on 10/2/2023 to add link to #1 complaint) (mk). |
Filing 13 ORDER AND NOTICE: Motions under FR Civ P 12(b) - 10/30/2023. Last day for Rule 26(f) meeting - 11/27/2023. Last day to file Report of Parties Planning Meeting and Scheduling Order Worksheet - 12/4/2023. Telephonic Scheduling Conference at 4:30 p.m. on 12/18/2023, before the undersigned, unless canceled. Entry of Scheduling Order - 12/28/2023. Last day to serve FR Civ P 26(a)(1) disclosures - 1/2/2024. Signed by Judge Frank W. Volk on 9/29/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (msa) |
Filing 12 Pre-Hearing held by Judge Frank W. Volk on 9/29/2023; Court Reporter: Lisa Cook. (sbw) |
Filing 11 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Melinda Ann Tuhus (DePaulo, William) |
Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Consol Defendant Rose Zheng Abramoff (DePaulo, William) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE by William V. DePaulo on behalf of Melinda Ann Tuhus, Rose Zheng Abramoff. (DePaulo, William) (Modified text on 9/29/2023 to add additional defendant's name and to add party filer) (mk). |
Filing 8 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Plaintiff Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (Miller, Timothy) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE on 9/21/2023 as to Rose Zheng Abramoff. Certified Mail Number: 92148901125134100003842303. (btm) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS ACCEPTED FOR SERVICE BY SECRETARY OF STATE on 9/21/2023 as to Melinda Ann Tuhus. Certified Mail Number: 92148901125134100003842297. (btm) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Hearing upon Melinda Ann Tuhus and Rose Zheng Abramoff re: #4 Order by Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Miller, Timothy) (Modified on 9/27/2023 to add link to #4 order) (mk). |
THIS CIVIL ACTION HAS BEEN CONSOLIDATED WITH CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-cv-00626 AS OF 9/25/2023; CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:23-cv-00625 HAS BEEN DESIGNATED AS THE LEAD ACTION; ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE CAPTIONED AND DOCKETED HEREIN. (btm) |
Filing 4 ORDER scheduling hearing for 9/29/2023 at 12:00 p.m. on #1 Complaint/Petition for Injunctive Relief; Counsel for plaintiff or their agents are DIRECTED to effectuate personal service on the Defendants at least 48 hours prior to the scheduled hearing; further directing that this case is consolidated with case number 5:23-cv-00626, with this case designated as the lead case, with all future filings made herein. Signed by Judge Frank W. Volk on 9/25/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (ts) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Melinda Ann Tuhus, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (jsa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8500045. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (jsa) |
CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.