Small v. Holzapfel
| Suresh H. Small |
| Warden Holzapfel |
| 5:2023cv00658 |
| October 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| Frank W Volk |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Before the Court Reflecting Prujudice by Suresh H. Small. (msa) |
| Filing 12 REPLY by Suresh H. Small to Respondent's #10 Response. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (msa) |
Filing 11
ORDER directing Petitioner to reply within 60 days of service of the #10 Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 11/29/2023. (cc: Petitioner, counsel of record) (lca)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE by Holzapfel to the Court's #6 Order. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Bailey, Jason) |
| Filing 9 OBJECTION to the Court's #8 Order by Suresh H. Small. (btm) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER denying #7 MOTION by Suresh H. Small to Decrease the 60-Day Time-Frame for the Respondent's Response as set forth herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 11/3/2023. (cc: Petitioner; USA) (mfo)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION by Suresh H. Small to Decrease the 60-Day Time-Frame for the Respondent's Response. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert. (btm) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241); directing Respondent to answer or respond within 60 days of the entry of this Order; a reply to the answer may be filed within 60 days after service of the same. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 10/16/2023. (cc: Petitioner, USA with attachment) (lca)
|
| Filing 5 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt No. 5000328. (arb) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (btm) |
| Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Suresh H. Small in support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (btm) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Suresh H. Small against Warden Holzapfel pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (btm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Small v. Holzapfel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Suresh H. Small | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Holzapfel | |
| Represented By: | Jason S. Bailey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
