Martin et al v. Shelby Transport, Inc. et al
| Stacey Lynne Martin and Daniel Joe Martin |
| Shelby Transport, Inc. and James Roy Frantz |
| 5:2024cv00067 |
| February 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Frank W Volk |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME to 04/15/2024 by James Roy Frantz, Shelby Transport, Inc. (Markins, Michael) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn. (cc: counsel of record and any pro se party) (arb) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Shelby Transport, Inc. and James Roy Frantz re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachment: #1 James Roy Frantz Summons) (arb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $405.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8590640. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons - Shelby Transport, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons - James Roy Frantz) (arb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
