Williams v. Warden
| Addidas Michael Williams |
| Warden |
| 5:2024cv00406 |
| August 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Omar J Aboulhosn |
| Frank W Volk |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE BRIEF by Addidas Michael Williams to #8 Response to Court Order. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (msa) |
Filing 9
ORDER AND NOTICE directing Petitioner to file any reply to the #8 Response to Court Order by 10/28/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 9/18/2024. (cc: Petitioner; counsel of record) (kew)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE by Warden to the Court's #5 Order. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Arthur, Christopher) |
| Filing 7 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from Warden re: #5 Order, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). Signed for on 8/20/2024 by A. Banton. (btm) |
| Filing 6 RETURN RECEIPT CARD received from United States Attorney re: #5 Order, #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). Signed for on 8/19/2024 by M. Wallace. (btm) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing that Respondent shall by 9/26/2024 file an Answer to the allegations contained in the Petitioner's #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) and show cause, if any, why the Writ of Habeas Corpus sought by the Petitioner should not be granted; the Petitioner may, if he wishes, file a Reply or Objections to Respondent's Answer by 10/28/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 8/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt - Warden, #2 Certified Mail Receipt - United States Attorney) (cc: Respondent and the Office of the United States Attorney by certified mail with copy of Petitioner's #1 Petition; Petitioner - pro se) (btm)
|
| Filing 4 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 5000539. (mfo) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PETITIONER OF FAILURE TO REMIT FILING FEE re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241). (msa) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record and any pro se party) (ts) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (ts) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Addidas Michael Williams against Warden, FCI Beckley pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1, #2 Exhibit A-2, #3 Exhibit A-3, #4 Envelope) (msa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Warden | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Addidas Michael Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden | |
| Represented By: | Christopher R. Arthur |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
