Baugh v. Holzapfel
| Leonard E. Baugh, Jr. |
| Warden: Holzapfel |
| 5:2024cv00555 |
| October 9, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Dwane L Tinsley |
| Frank W Volk |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 LETTER to Clerk of Court, from Leonard Baugh dated 12/3/2024, re: Payment of filing fee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Inmate Account Transactions, #3 Envelope) (btm) |
| Filing 9 Filing Fee Received: $5.00, Receipt Number 5000673. Filing Fee paid in full. (lca) |
Filing 8
ORDER AND NOTICE directing that Petitioner's #7 LETTER-FORM MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee is GRANTED; further directing that Petitioner's $5.00 filing fee shall be received by the Clerk of Court by 12/6/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 11/26/2024. (cc: Petitioner) (skm)
|
| Filing 7 LETTER-FORM MOTION by Leonard E. Baugh, Jr for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence Pages 1 - 3, #2 Inmate Account Transactions Pages 4 - 5, #3 Envelope) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (btm) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER AND NOTICE directing that Petitioner's #5 LETTER-FORM MOTION for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee is GRANTED; Petitioner's $5.00 filing fee shall be received by the Court by 11/22/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 11/8/2024. (cc: Petitioner) (btm)
|
| Filing 5 LETTER-FORM MOTION by Leonard E. Baugh, Jr for Extension of Time to Pay Filing Fee. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. (btm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER AND NOTICE directing that Petitioner shall either pay the $5.00 filing fee or file the enclosed Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs by 10/31/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 10/10/2024. (cc: Petitioner with enclosures) (lca)
|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED SEPTEMBER 1, 2024. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record and any pro se party) (ts) |
| CASE assigned to Chief Judge Frank W. Volk. (ts) |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Leonard E. Baugh, Jr against Warden Holzapfel pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (btm) |
| Filing 1 LETTER-FORM MOTION by Leonard E. Baugh, Jr to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (btm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Baugh v. Holzapfel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden: Holzapfel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Leonard E. Baugh, Jr. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
