United Bankshares, Inc. et al v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
| United Bankshares, Inc. and United Bank |
| St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company |
| 6:2010cv00188 |
| February 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Parkersburg Office |
| Wood |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part the 63 MOTION to Dismiss; denying the 65 MOTION to Change Venue; granting in part and denying in part the 50 MOTION to Dismiss. The motion is granted as it pertains to dismissin g Count V of the Second Amended Complaint against the defendant Federal and denied as it pertains to transferring venue to the Eastern District of Virginia. The court orders that Counts VI and VII of the plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint be dismissed as to all defendants and that Count V of the plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint be dismissed only as to the defendant Federal Insurance Company. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/4/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (jkk)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 36 Motion Seeking Clarification of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order of 5/3/2010 or, in the Alternative, for a Protective Order Pursuant to FRCivP 26(c). Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 5/21/2010. (cc: attys) (gan) Modified on 5/24/2010 to correct document number for underlying motion from 28 to 36. (jkk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
