Mazza v. Deuley, et al
| Timothy Michael Mazza |
| Nathan R. Deuley, M. W. Eichhorn, R. L. Koher and City of Parkersburg |
| 6:2010cv00834 |
| June 17, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Parkersburg Office |
| Wood |
| Joseph R. Goodwin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED for City of Parkersburg, Nathan R. Deuley, M. W. Eichhorn, R. L. Koher, City of Parkersburg served on 6/24/2010, answer due 7/15/2010; Nathan R. Deuley served on 6/24/2010, answer due 7/15/2010; M. W. Eichhorn served on 6/24/2010, answer due 7/15/2010; R. L. Koher served on 6/24/2010, answer due 7/15/2010. |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED by the Clerk on behalf of Timothy Michael Mazza for Nathan R. Deuley, M. W. Eichhorn, R. L. Koher, City of Parkersburg re: 1 Complaint, returnable 21 days. Original Summons and 1 copy for each defendant mailed to Michael T. Clifford for service. |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS SUBMITTED by Timothy Michael Mazza for City of Parkersburg, Nathan R. Deuley, M. W. Eichhorn, R. L. Koher, re: 1 Complaint. |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED AUGUST 1, 2006. This matter referred to Magistrate Judge Stanley for discovery. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $350.00. Receipt # 0425-1297855. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
