Kaprelian v. Bowers et al
Timothy Jay Kaprelian |
Bowers, Schauer, Rusfeldt, Jarosz, Klaus, Mount Pleasant Police Department and Village of Mount Pleasant |
2:2009cv00609 |
June 18, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Dodge |
Maryland Unassigned |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 2/11/11 as follows: granting 46 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 62 plaintiff's motion to renew motion; and DISMISSING this case on its merits, with prejudice. See Order. (cc: plaintiff, all counsel) (nm) |
Filing 48 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 5/28/10 as follows: denying 22 plaintiff's Motion for Interlocutory Summary Judgment; denying 26 plaintiff's Motion for Order granting him leave to take written depositions; denying 26 plainti ff's Motion for Order that defendants appear to respond to interrogatories; denying 31 plaintiff's motion challenging the existence of consent to enter the home; denying 38 plaintiff's Motion to Compel; denying 42 plaintiff' s Motion for Sanctions; the plaintiff may resubmit his request for interrogatories and for productions of documents on or before 6/14/10; the defendants shall respond to the discovery requests on or before 7/16/10; the plaintiff shall file his response to defendants' motion for summary judgment on or before 8/16/10 (cc: plaintiff, all counsel) (nm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.