Cases
Pamela Antosh, et al v. Village of Mount Pleasant, et al
as 23-1678
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAMELA J. ANTOSH and NED E. LASHLEY
Defendant / Appellee: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PLEASANT, DAVID DE GROOT and VILLAGE OF MOUNT PLEASANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Antosh et al v. Village of Mount Pleasant et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00117
Plaintiff: Pamela J Antosh, Ned E. Lashley and Ned E Lashley
Defendant: Village of Mount Pleasant, David De Groot and Village of Mount Pleasant Community Development Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Kowalczuk v. Eric Giese, et al
as 21-1753
Defendant / Appellee: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PLEASANT and ERIC GIESE
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL A. KOWALCZUK
Kowalczuk v. Giese et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01230
Defendant: Village of Mount Pleasant, Eric Giese and Matt Soens
Plaintiff: Mr. Michael A. Kowalczuk and Michael A Kowalczuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodney Jensen, et al v. Village of Mount Pleasant, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-2187
Plaintiff - Appellant: RODNEY JENSEN, MICHAEL R. SCHMIDT, MARY JANE SCHMIDT and others
Defendant - Appellee: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PLEASANT, DAVID DE GROOT, Village President and VILLAGE OF MOUNT PLEASANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Jensen et al v. Village of Mount Pleasant et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv00046
Plaintiff: Rodney Jensen , Michael R Schmidt , Mary Jane Schmidt and others
Defendant: Village of Mount Pleasant and David De Groot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaprelian v. Bowers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00609
Plaintiff: Timothy Jay Kaprelian
Defendant: Bowers, Schauer, Rusfeldt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?