Clark v. Doe #1 et al
Plaintiff: Shane Clark
Defendant: John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and John Doe #4
Case Number: 2:2018cv00809
Filed: May 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Winnebago
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 3/20/2020. 34 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Brittany McCutcheon and Nathan Haynes are DISMISSED with prejudice. Defendants Brittany McCutcheon and Nathan Haynes are DISMISSED from this action. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Shane Clark at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution)(jm)
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 4/24/2019: DENYING 29 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel and DISMISSING without prejudice Defendants John Does #1-8. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Shane Clark at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution)(jm)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 10/26/2018. 20 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is the OPERATIVE pleading. Defendant Brian Foster is DISMISSED from this action. Plaintiff is PERMITTED to proceed on a claim of deliberate i ndifference to Plaintiff's serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, against Defendants. Copies of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and this Order to be electronically SENT to the Wisconsin DOJ for service on Defendants, who shall FILE a responsive pleading within 60 days. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Shane Clark at Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution)(jm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Doe #1 et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shane Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe #1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe #2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe #3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe #4
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?