Cases 1 - 10 of 21
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31218
Plaintiff:
SHANE CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Miller v. Thomas Nelling, et al
as 23-2788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS NELLING, THOMAS GOGGIN, JOHN O'DONNELL and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS, MITCHELL ROCK and others
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv08275
Plaintiff:
SHANE CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv18013
Plaintiff:
SHANE CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Boyd v. Layer Cake Creative Services LLC et al
as 1:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd
Defendant:
Layer Cake Creative Services LLC, Michael Clark and Shane Clark
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Clark v. Gesta et al
as 2:2022cv01081
Plaintiff:
Shane Clark
Defendant:
CO Gesta, Ludwig and Dr Yang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. GOGGIN et al
as 2:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
JOHN RYAN MILLER
Defendant:
THOMAS NELLING, JOSEPH ELIAS, TRACEY LAWS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51148
Plaintiff:
SHANE CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitt v. Casto et al
as 2:2021cv00881
Defendant:
Kim Bayless, Shane Clark, Steve Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen H. Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00090
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4311
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
