Harris v. Clarke
| Rickey J Harris, III |
| David Clarke |
| 2:2018cv00813 |
| May 25, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Chippewa |
| William E Duffin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
DECISION and ORDER. The court orders that this case be DISMISSEDfor failure to prosecute and comply with the courts orders. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
20
SCREENING ORDER denying 14 MOTION to Compel, granting 16 MOTION to Substitute Parties, and dismissing Defendant Richard Schmidt. Defendants are to file a responsive pleading within 60 days. Signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 9/14/2018. (cc: Rickey J Harris III, Warden Reed Richardson)(Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 10 Report and Recommendations, signed by Chief Judge William C Griesbach on 8/21/2018. David Clarke is DISMSSED as a defendant in this case. Plaintiff shall identify the names of the John Doe Deputies by 9/10/2018. (cc: all counsel, via US Mail to Harris)(Griesbach, William)
|
|
Filing
9
SCREENING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 7/25/2018, GRANTING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. The court NAMES John Does and Richard Schmidt as defendants and DIRECTS the clerk's offic e to add them to the caption of this case. The court ORDERS the clerk's office to electronically send copies of Harris's complaint and this order to Milwaukee County for service on defendant Richard Schmidt. The court further ORDERS that Richard Schmidt does not have to respond to Harris's complaint; however, he must respond to Harris's discovery requests as described in this order. The court further ORDERS that Harris must identify the Doe deputies' names within for ty-five days of Sheriff Schmidt's attorney filing a notice of appearance in the case. If he does not, or does not explain to the court why he is unable to identify their names, the court may dismiss this case based on his failure to diligently pursue it. (continued below)... (cc: all counsel, plaintiff via USPS, Warden-SCI) (mlm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harris v. Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rickey J Harris, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David Clarke | |
| Represented By: | Milwaukee County - 550, 555 |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
