Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05178
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Clark v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00505
Petitioner: David Clark
Respondent: Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Petersen et al v. Lippman et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: David Clarke, Thomas Barnes, Julian Veira and others
Defendant: Paul E Lippman, Catherine Lippman and Matthew Lippman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff: Clarence Vaughn
Defendant: Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahajni v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2024cv00416
Plaintiff: Marwan Mahajni
Defendant: Milwaukee County, Deputy Vo Do, Deputy Scott Woida and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01305
Petitioner: James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01205
Petitioner: James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01016
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00656
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Middleton v. Hollowell et al
as 5:2024cv00023
Plaintiff: Brenda Danelle Middleton
Defendant: Christopher Hollowell, Jamie Mills, Audrie Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?