Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01305
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01205
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2022cv04332
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clarke v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00492
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Feds for Medical Freedom et al v. Biden, Jr. et al
as 3:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
Feds for Medical Freedom, Local 918, American Federation of Government Employees, Highland Engineering, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., The United States of America, Pete Buttigieg and others
Counter Claimant:
Marcus William Thornton
Claimant:
Joseph Charles Ainsworth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Clark v. Lumpkin
as 1:2021cv00560
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Charles David Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv01970
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Charles David Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clark et al v. Heritage Land Bank FLCA
as 3:2017cv00735
Plaintiff:
David Clark and Christi Clark
Defendant:
Heritage Land Bank FLCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clarke v. Foley et al
as 2:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
James David Clarke, Jr
Defendant:
Kevin D Foley, Hector S Ramirez, NFN Luccurio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfrey v. Pikett et al
as 4:2014cv00448
Plaintiff:
Megan Winfrey
Defendant:
Keith Pikett, Lacy Rogers, Lenard Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
